Graph 1. Demand on Sunday vs Monday<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n <\/p>\n
Pricing<\/u><\/strong><\/p>\n The question is \u2013 if there was an Amber Alert for similar reasons as in January, why was the imbalance price significantly lower this time around?<\/p>\n
It can all be explained by the bidding behaviour of the most expensive plants in the set of bids accepted by the TSO. The two most expensive plants in both cases were the older NI units. On the 24th<\/sup> January, the two units in question submitted incremental prices of \u20ac6,342\/MWh and \u20ac5,637\/MWh. Conversely on the 8th<\/sup> July, the same units submitted simple offer incremental prices of \u20ac500\/MWh. As the imbalance price is a weighted average of the most expensive 120MW of unflagged actions taken, the 5-minute imbalance price was set notably lower in July (peak of \u20ac226.52\/MWh) than in January (peak of \u20ac3,773\/MWh).<\/p>\n <\/p>\nGraph 2. BM Prices Jan 24th vs July 8th<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n <\/p>\n
Conclusion<\/u><\/strong><\/p>\n In the space of six months, two Amber Alerts have occurred on the Irish system as a result of similar incidents in Northern Ireland. Undoubtably the first incident had the largest effect on imbalance prices. The introduction of Mod 09_19 which removed flags for units bound by locational constraints may have caused more ROI units to contribute to the imbalance price compared to January.<\/p>\n
However, the occurrence of these events and price spikes are an obvious market signal that extra generation is required in Northern Ireland. On both occasions the units were setting the marginal price, and the major difference between January and July was their submitted simple bids. If the generator had desired, it could have submitted prices at the market cap price: the system clearly needed the units during the alert. To ensure market competitiveness and system stability and reliability, new generating capacity is required in the North. These pricing events provide a clear investment signal and should not be overlooked.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
8th July marked the second All-Island Amber Alert since project I-SEM launched in October 2018. The first Amber Alert, issued on the 24th of January and covered in a previous ElectroRoute Insights blog, coincided with a price spike of \u20ac3,774\/MWh.\u00a0 Today, we analyse the events which led to the Amber Alert and examine the resulting market behaviour.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":10,"featured_media":4706,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[77],"tags":[319,320,321],"acf":[],"yoast_head":"\n
Price Spikes: 8th July 2019 - ElectroRoute<\/title>\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\t \n\t \n\t \n \n \n \n\t \n\t \n\t \n